|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Social Sciences Research Reports|
|Peer Review Status:||Unrefereed|
|Title:||Creativity and effectiveness in the use of electronic monitoring: a case study of five European jurisdictions|
|Citation:||Hucklesby A, Beyens K, Boone M, Dunkel F, McIvor G & Graham H (2016) Creativity and effectiveness in the use of electronic monitoring: a case study of five European jurisdictions. European Commission. University of Leeds.|
|Publisher:||University of Leeds|
|Abstract:||The comparative research project covered current uses of electronic monitoring (EM) 5 jurisdictions in Europe: Belgium, England and Wales, Germany, the Netherlands and Scotland. An extensive literature review was undertaken alongside observations of all aspects of the EM process (75 days in total) and 190 interviews with policy-makers and practitioners involved in the provision of EM.|
|Rights:||The publisher has granted permission for use of this work in this Repository. Published as ‘Creativity and effectiveness in the use of electronic monitoring: a case study of five European jurisdictions’, conducted for the Use of Electronic Monitoring in EU Member States project: http://emeu.leeds.ac.uk/|
|Affiliation:||University of Leeds|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University of Greifswald
|Briefing Paper - Comparative - Electronic Monitoring A Case Study in 5 European Jurisdictions.pdf||353.47 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.