Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22983
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFrance, Emmaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWells, Maryen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLang, Heidien_UK
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Brianen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-13T01:39:19Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-13T01:39:19Z-
dc.date.issued2016-03-15en_UK
dc.identifier.other44en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/22983-
dc.description.abstractBackground  Meta-ethnography is a unique, systematic, qualitative synthesis approach widely used to provide robust evidence on patient and clinician beliefs and experiences and understandings of complex social phenomena. It can make important theoretical and conceptual contributions to health care policy and practice.  Results  Since beliefs, experiences, health care contexts and social phenomena change over time, the continued relevance of the findings from meta-ethnographies cannot be assumed. However, there is little guidance on whether, when and how meta-ethnographies should be updated; Cochrane guidance on updating reviews of intervention effectiveness is unlikely to be fully appropriate. This is the first in-depth discussion on updating a meta-ethnography; it explores why, when and how to update a meta-ethnography. Three main methods of updating the analysis and synthesis are examined. Advantages and disadvantages of each method are outlined, relating to the context, purpose, process and output of the update and the nature of the new data available. Recommendations are made for the appropriate use of each method, and a worked example of updating a meta-ethnography is provided.  Conclusions  This article makes a unique contribution to this evolving area of meta-ethnography methodology.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_UK
dc.relationFrance E, Wells M, Lang H & Williams B (2016) Why, when and how to update a meta-ethnography qualitative synthesis. Systematic Reviews, 5, Art. No.: 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0218-4en_UK
dc.rights© France et al. 2016 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectCanceren_UK
dc.subjectQualitative analysisen_UK
dc.subjectMeta-ethnographyen_UK
dc.subjectMeta-synthesisen_UK
dc.subjectSystematic reviewsen_UK
dc.subjectQualitative reviewsen_UK
dc.titleWhy, when and how to update a meta-ethnography qualitative synthesisen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13643-016-0218-4en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid26979748en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleSystematic Reviewsen_UK
dc.citation.issn2046-4053en_UK
dc.citation.volume5en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailemma.france@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date15/03/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000453148200043en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85007408827en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid575816en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0876-7030en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5789-2773en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0000-4354en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-02-24en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-02-24en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-03-17en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorFrance, Emma|0000-0003-0876-7030en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWells, Mary|0000-0001-5789-2773en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLang, Heidi|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWilliams, Brian|0000-0003-0000-4354en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-03-17en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2016-03-17|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameFrance et al_Systematic Reviews_2016.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
France et al_Systematic Reviews_2016.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.