Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22982
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Does exposure to cigarette brands increase the likelihood of adolescent e-cigarette use? A cross-sectional study |
Author(s): | Best, Catherine van der Sluijs, Winfried Haseen, Farhana Eadie, Douglas Stead, Martine MacKintosh, Anne Marie Pearce, Jamie Tisch, Catherine MacGregor, Andy Amos, Amanda Miller, Martine Frank, John W Haw, Sally |
Contact Email: | catherine.best2@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | Health policy Public health Smoking and tobacco |
Issue Date: | Feb-2016 |
Date Deposited: | 17-Mar-2016 |
Citation: | Best C, van der Sluijs W, Haseen F, Eadie D, Stead M, MacKintosh AM, Pearce J, Tisch C, MacGregor A, Amos A, Miller M, Frank JW & Haw S (2016) Does exposure to cigarette brands increase the likelihood of adolescent e-cigarette use? A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 6 (2), Art. No.: e008734. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008734 |
Abstract: | OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between tobacco cigarette brand recognition, and e-cigarette use in adolescents. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: High schools in Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Questionnaires were administered to pupils in Secondary 2 (S2 mean age: 14.0 years) and Secondary 4 (S4 mean age: 15.9 years) across 4 communities in Scotland. An 86\% response rate with a total sample of 1404 pupils was achieved. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported previous use of e-cigarettes and self-reported intention to try e-cigarettes in the next 6 months. RESULTS: 75\% (1029/1377) of respondents had heard of e-cigarettes (69.5\% S2, 81.1\% S4), and of these, 17.3\% (10.6\% S2, 24.3\% S4 n=1020) had ever tried an e-cigarette. 6.8\% (3.7\% S2, 10.0\% S4 n=1019) reported that they intended to try an e-cigarette in the next 6 months. Recognition of more cigarette brands was associated with greater probability of previous e-cigarette use (OR 1.20, 99\% CI 1.05 to 1.38) as was having a best friend who smoked (OR 3.17, 99\% CI 1.42 to 7.09). Intention to try e-cigarettes was related to higher cigarette brand recognition (OR 1.41, 99\% CI 1.07 to 1.87), hanging around in the street or park more than once a week (OR 3.78, 99\% CI 1.93 to 7.39) and living in areas of high tobacco retail density (OR 1.20, 99\% CI 1.08 to 1.34). Never having smoked was a protective factor for both future intention to try, and past e-cigarette use (OR 0.07, 99\% CI 0.02 to 0.25; and OR 0.10, 99\% CI 0.07 to 0.16, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Higher cigarette brand recognition was associated with increased probability of previous use and of intention to use e-cigarettes. The impact of tobacco control measures such as restricting point-of-sale displays on the uptake of e-cigarettes in young people should be evaluated. |
DOI Link: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008734 |
Rights: | This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Best BMJ Open 2016full.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 759.83 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.