Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22936
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLuce, Annen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCash, Marilynen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHundley, Vanoraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCheyne, Helenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorvan Teijlingen, Edwinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAngell, Catherineen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-19T00:26:21Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-19T00:26:21Z-
dc.date.issued2016-02-29en_UK
dc.identifier.other40en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/22936-
dc.description.abstractBackground  Considerable debate surrounds the influence media have on first-time pregnant women. Much of the academic literature discusses the influence of (reality) television, which often portrays birth as risky, dramatic and painful and there is evidence that this has a negative effect on childbirth in society, through the increasing anticipation of negative outcomes. It is suggested that women seek out such programmes to help understand what could happen during the birth because there is a cultural void. However the impact that has on normal birth has not been explored.  Methods  A scoping review relating to the representation of childbirth in the mass media, particularly on television.  Results  Three key themes emerged: (a) medicalisation of childbirth; (b) women using media to learn about childbirth; and (c) birth as a missing everyday life event.  Conclusion  Media appear to influence how women engage with childbirth. The dramatic television portrayal of birth may perpetuate the medicalisation of childbirth, and last, but not least, portrayals of normal birth are often missing in the popular media. Hence midwives need to engage with television producers to improve the representation of midwifery and maternity in the media.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_UK
dc.relationLuce A, Cash M, Hundley V, Cheyne H, van Teijlingen E & Angell C (2016) Is it realistic? The Portrayal of Pregnancy and Childbirth in the Media. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16, Art. No.: 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0827-xen_UK
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectMedical modelen_UK
dc.subjectReality televisionen_UK
dc.subjectLabouren_UK
dc.subjectMedicalizationen_UK
dc.subjectMidwiferyen_UK
dc.titleIs it realistic? The Portrayal of Pregnancy and Childbirth in the Mediaen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12884-016-0827-xen_UK
dc.identifier.pmid26928660en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMC Pregnancy and Childbirthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1471-2393en_UK
dc.citation.volume16en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailh.l.cheyne@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date29/02/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBournemouth Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBournemouth Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBournemouth Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBournemouth Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBournemouth Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000371005100003en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84962129715en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid576630en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5738-8390en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-02-12en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-02-12en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-03-08en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorLuce, Ann|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCash, Marilyn|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHundley, Vanora|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCheyne, Helen|0000-0001-5738-8390en_UK
local.rioxx.authorvan Teijlingen, Edwin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAngell, Catherine|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-03-08en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2016-03-08|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameLuce et al_BMC Preg and CB_2016.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Luce et al_BMC Preg and CB_2016.pdfFulltext - Published Version550.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.