Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22787
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHaddow, Gillen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKing, Emmaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKunkler, Ianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcLaren, Duncanen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-27T23:58:31Z-
dc.date.available2016-01-27T23:58:31Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/22787-
dc.description.abstractAn in vivo biosensor is a technology in development that will assess the biological activity of cancers to individualise external beam radiotherapy. Inserting such technology into the human body creates cybernetic organisms; a cyborg that is a human–machine hybrid. There is a gap in knowledge relating to patient willingness to allow automated technology to be embedded and to become cyborg. There is little agreement around what makes a cyborg and less understanding of the variation in the cyborgisation process. Understanding the viewpoint of possible beneficiaries addresses such gaps. There are currently three versions of ‘cyborg’ in the literature (i) a critical feminist STS concept to destabilise power inherent in dualisms, (ii) an extreme version of the human/machine in science-fiction that emphasises the ‘man’ in human and (iii) a prediction of internal physiological adaptation required for future space exploration. Interview study findings with 12 men in remission from prostate cancer show a fourth version can be used to describe current and future sub-groups of the population; ‘everyday cyborgs'. For the everyday cyborg the masculine cyborg status found in the fictionalised human–machine related to issues of control of the cancer. This was preferred to the felt stigmatisation of being a ‘leaker and bleeder’. The willingness to become cyborg was matched with a having to get used to the everyday cyborg's technological adaptations and risks. It is crucial to explore the everyday cyborg's sometimes ambivalent viewpoint. The everyday cyborg thus adds the dimension of participant voice currently missing in existing cyborg literatures and imaginations.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_UK
dc.relationHaddow G, King E, Kunkler I & McLaren D (2015) Cyborgs in the Everyday: Masculinity and Biosensing Prostate Cancer. Science as Culture, 24 (4), pp. 484-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2015.1063597en_UK
dc.rightsCopyright 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectin vivo biosensorsen_UK
dc.subjectpatient ambivalenceen_UK
dc.subjectqualitative researchen_UK
dc.subjecteveryday cyborgen_UK
dc.subjectmasculinity and stigmatisationen_UK
dc.titleCyborgs in the Everyday: Masculinity and Biosensing Prostate Canceren_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09505431.2015.1063597en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleScience as Cultureen_UK
dc.citation.issn1470-1189en_UK
dc.citation.issn0950-5431en_UK
dc.citation.volume24en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.spage484en_UK
dc.citation.epage506en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailemma.king@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date03/09/2015en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Research - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000364385700006en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84947046199en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid587321en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3611-9647en_UK
dc.date.accepted2015-05-19en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-05-19en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-01-27en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHaddow, Gill|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKing, Emma|0000-0003-3611-9647en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKunkler, Ian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcLaren, Duncan|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-01-27en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2016-01-27|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameHaddow et al_Science as Culture_2015.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0950-5431en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Haddow et al_Science as Culture_2015.pdfFulltext - Published Version397.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.