Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22660
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKing, David Nen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEiser, Daviden_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-07T01:29:01Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-07T01:29:01Z-
dc.date.issued2017-03en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/22660-
dc.description.abstractThe UK's devolved administrations (DGs) receive block grants to finance almost all their expenditure. The Barnett formula used to calculate these grants is often criticised because it does not consider the DGs’ spending needs. However, the feasibility of allocating block grants by needs assessment is often questioned, given the contestability of spending needs. This paper compares the formula used within England to assess the education spending needs of local authorities there with the equivalent Scottish formula, by using each formula in turn to calculate the relative spending needs of the UK territories. The rationale is to consider how similar the two formulae are in how they estimate the territories’ relative spending needs for education, a major responsibility of the devolved governments.  The results show that the English and Scottish education allocation formulae produce similar estimates of the territories’ relative education spending needs. This suggests that it may be more feasible to allocate education resources to the UK's devolved territories based on needs assessment than some have suggested. The results also suggest some inequity in current patterns of education spending across the UK.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell for Institute for Fiscal Studiesen_UK
dc.relationKing DN & Eiser D (2017) Allocating Grant to the UK's Devolved Territories by Needs Assessment: Lessons from School Funding Formulae in England and Scotland. Fiscal Studies, 38 (1), pp. 81-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12088en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Eiser D & King D Allocating Grant to the UK's Devolved Territories by Needs Assessment: Lessons from School Funding Formulae in England and Scotland (2017), Fiscal Studies, 38: 81–109 which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12088. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.en_UK
dc.subjectBarnett formulaen_UK
dc.subjectspending needs assessmenten_UK
dc.subjectschool fundingen_UK
dc.subjectH72en_UK
dc.subjectH75en_UK
dc.subjectR50en_UK
dc.titleAllocating Grant to the UK's Devolved Territories by Needs Assessment: Lessons from School Funding Formulae in England and Scotlanden_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2017-12-15en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[EISER_et_al-Fiscal_Studies.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 24 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1475-5890.12088en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleFiscal Studiesen_UK
dc.citation.issn1475-5890en_UK
dc.citation.issn0143-5671en_UK
dc.citation.volume38en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage81en_UK
dc.citation.epage109en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderEconomic and Social Research Councilen_UK
dc.author.emaildavid.eiser@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date14/12/2015en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEconomicsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEconomicsen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000397492300004en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85013625731en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid581245en_UK
dc.date.accepted2015-12-14en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-12-14en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-01-07en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectDevelopment of needs-based funding models for the devolved territories in the UKen_UK
dc.relation.funderrefES/I005021/1en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorKing, David N|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEiser, David|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectES/I005021/1|Economic and Social Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000269en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-12-15en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2017-12-14en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2017-12-15|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameEISER_et_al-Fiscal_Studies.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0143-5671en_UK
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
EISER_et_al-Fiscal_Studies.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version1.13 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.