|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections|
|Title:||Some Reflections on Age Discrimination, Referees’ Retirement Ages and European Sports (La|
|Citation:||McArdle D (2009) Some Reflections on Age Discrimination, Referees’ Retirement Ages and European Sports (Law). In: Gardiner Simon, Parrish Richard, Siekmann Robert (ed.). EU, Sport, Law and Policy: Regulation, Re-regulation and Representation, Den Haag: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 151-16|
|Abstract:||Introduction: This paper is the first in a series of reflections on the relationship between discrimination, sport and the law, a body of work that has been motivated in part by the potential impact of the 2000 Equalities Directive upon European sports law, but also by developments in human rights jurisprudence and in the domestic laws of several jurisdictions. The phenomenon of age discrimination in sport, and the social and economic impact thereof, has been far less widely considered than is the case with other forms of sports discrimination (although the literature would miraculously emerge if the subject-matter were more directly concerned with men’s professional football). In contrast, free movement and competition law have impacted significantly upon sports provisions that discriminate on the basis of nationality; it is equally evident that age discrimination in the context of sports employment has not been considered with anything approaching the degree of sophistication that pervades our understanding of discrimination in occupation or employment on the grounds of disability, sexual orientation and religion/belief (the other discriminatory forms that are covered by the 2000 Directive); and our poor understanding of age-related sports discrimination generally stands in marked contrast to our appreciation of how challenges to discrimination on the grounds of sex and race have precipitated far-reaching changes to sports practices. Throughout the EU, with the possible exception of the Irish Republic, age discrimination law is far less advanced than is the case with discrimination which takes any of those other forms, the remedies are weaker and fewer people are aware of them. However, this state of affairs will undoubtedly change under the impact of the Equalities Directive, and even though the provisions themselves (and member states’ transposing of them) attract legitimate criticism, some longstanding practices of sports bodies are now open to challe|
|Rights:||Published in EU, Sport, Law and Policy: Regulation, Re-regulation and Representation. Copyright: T.M.C. Asser Press.; The publisher has granted permission for use of this book chapter in this Repository. The chapter was first published in EU, Sport, Law and Policy: Regulation, Re-regulation and Representation by T.M.C. Asser Press.|
|Parrish draft2.pdf||203.91 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Parrish draft2.doc||163 kB||Microsoft Word||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.