Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22058
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaratzias, Thanosen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPower, Kevin Georgeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcGoldrick, Thereseen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Keithen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBuchanan, Robinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSharp, Donalden_UK
dc.contributor.authorSwanson, Vivienen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-23T01:34:49Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-23T01:34:49Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2007-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/22058-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to investigate predictors of treatment outcome for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after treatment completion and at 15-months follow-up (n = 48), in a trial of Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing (EMDR) versus Imaginal Exposure and Cognitive Restructuring (E+CR). Factors associated with treatment outcome were investigated using regression analyses with the mean change scores in three assessor and self-rated PTSD symptomatology measures, including the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS), the Impact of Events Scale (IES) and the PTSD Symptom Checklist (PCL) from pre- to post-treatment and pre-treatment to follow-up as the dependent variables and demographics, trauma, clinical and personality measures as independent variables. Irrespective to outcome measures and assessment points it was found that four variables were able to predict significantly treatment outcome. These included baseline PTSD symptomatology, number of sessions, gender and therapy type. Overall, our results showed that it is difficult to use pre-treatment variables as a powerful and reliable tool for predicting treatment outcome, as significant predictors were found to be sample-specific and outcome measure-specific. Clinical relevance of the present results and directions for future research are discussed.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSpringeren_UK
dc.relationKaratzias T, Power KG, McGoldrick T, Brown K, Buchanan R, Sharp D & Swanson V (2007) Predicting treatment outcome on three measures for post-traumatic stress disorder. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 257 (1), pp. 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-006-0682-2en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectpost-traumatic stress disorderen_UK
dc.subjectpredictorsen_UK
dc.subjecttreatment outcomeen_UK
dc.titlePredicting treatment outcome on three measures for post-traumatic stress disorderen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-17en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Karatzias et al_EAPCN_2007.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00406-006-0682-2en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEuropean Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscienceen_UK
dc.citation.issn1433-8491en_UK
dc.citation.issn0940-1334en_UK
dc.citation.volume257en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage40en_UK
dc.citation.epage46en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailvivien.swanson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date16/08/2006en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdinburgh Napier Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAnxiety and Stress Research Centre - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Forth Valleyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Research - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Forth Valleyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Hullen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000244294500007en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-33847115322en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid794284en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1685-2991en_UK
dc.date.accepted2006-04-06en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2006-04-06en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2015-07-21en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorKaratzias, Thanos|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPower, Kevin George|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcGoldrick, Therese|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBrown, Keith|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBuchanan, Robin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSharp, Donald|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSwanson, Vivien|0000-0002-1685-2991en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-17en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameKaratzias et al_EAPCN_2007.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0940-1334en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Karatzias et al_EAPCN_2007.pdfFulltext - Published Version160.19 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-17    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.