|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Who Must Presume Whom to be Innocent of What?|
|Authors:||Duff, R A|
|Keywords:||presumption of innocence|
defendants' rights and responsibilities
|Citation:||Duff RA (2013) Who Must Presume Whom to be Innocent of What?, Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 42 (3), pp. 170-192.|
|Abstract:||This paper considers the roles that may be played by a “presumption of innocence” outside the criminal trial — a presumption that reflects a general principle of civic trust. We can understand the significance of this presumption, and the ways in which it can be qualified (without being defeated) by attending to some of the normative roles that citizens might take on, or have imposed on them, in relation to the criminal law, and the responsibilities or duties that attach to those roles. Particular attention is paid to the distinctive roles of “defendant” and of “ex-offender”, and to the question of whether it can be consistent with the presumption of innocence to treat either defendants or those who have completed their punishments as, if not guilty, at least far from unqualifiedly innocent.|
|Rights:||Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy by Boom Juridische Uitgevers. The original publication is available at: http://www.elevenjournals.com/tijdschrift/rechtsfilosofieentheorie/2013/3/NJLP_2213-0713_2013_042_003_002|
|NJLP_2013_042_003_duff.pdf||260.47 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.