|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Guiding Commitments and Criminal Liability for Attempts|
|Authors:||Duff, R A|
Guiding commitment view
Attempts and mere preparation
Attempts and endangerments
Circumstantial aspects of attempts
|Citation:||Duff RA (2012) Guiding Commitments and Criminal Liability for Attempts, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 6 (3), pp. 411-427.|
|Abstract:||The" Guiding Commitment View" is central to Yaffe's account of attempts in general, and of criminal attempts in particular. I argue, first, that it is too wide, since it does not provide a plausible distinction between attempts and "mere preparation"; second, that on the other hand Yaffe does not do enough to justify a law of criminal attempts, rather than a broader law that would also cover endangerment; and third, that the Guiding Commitment View cannot deal with some difficult issues about the circumstantial aspects of criminal attempts.|
|Rights:||Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository; The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-012-9170-0|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.