Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21968
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Early years interventions to improve child health and wellbeing: what works, for whom and in what circumstances? Protocol for a realist review
Authors: Coles, Emma
Cheyne, Helen
Daniel, Brigid
Contact Email: emma.coles@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: realist review
realist synthesis
early years
child health
maternal health
child development
wellbeing
health inequalities
early intervention
Issue Date: 6-Jun-2015
Publisher: BioMed Central
Citation: Coles E, Cheyne H & Daniel B (2015) Early years interventions to improve child health and wellbeing: what works, for whom and in what circumstances? Protocol for a realist review, Systematic Reviews, 4, Art. No.: 79.
Abstract: Background: Child health and wellbeing is influenced by multiple factors, all of which can impact on early childhood development. Adverse early life experiences can have lasting effects across the life course, sustaining inequalities and resulting in negative consequences for the health and wellbeing of individuals and society. The potential to influence future outcomes via early intervention is widely accepted; there are numerous policy initiatives, programmes and interventions clustered around the early years theme, resulting in a broad and disparate evidence base. Existing reviews have addressed the effectiveness of early years interventions, yet there is a knowledge gap regarding the mechanisms underlying why interventions work in given contexts. Methods/design: This realist review seeks to address the question ‘what works, for whom and in what circumstances?' in terms of early years interventions to improve child health and wellbeing. The review will be conducted following Pawson's five-stage iterative realist methodology: (1) clarify scope, (2) search for evidence, (3) appraise primary studies and extract data, (4) synthesise evidence and draw conclusions and (5) disseminate findings. The reviewers will work with stakeholders in the early stages to refine the focus of the review, create a review framework and build programme theory. Searches for primary evidence will be conducted iteratively. Data will be extracted and tested against the programme theory. A review collaboration group will oversee the review process. Discussion: The review will demonstrate how early years interventions do or do not work in different contexts and with what outcomes and effects. Review findings will be written up following the RAMESES guidelines and will be disseminated via a report, presentations and peer-reviewed publications. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42015017832
Type: Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21968
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0068-5
Rights: © 2015 Coles et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Affiliation: NMAHP Research
NMAHP Research
Social Work

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s13643-015-0068-5.pdf386.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.