|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections|
|Title:||Torts, Crimes and Vindication: Whose Wrong is it?|
|Authors:||Duff, R A|
|Citation:||Duff RA (2014) Torts, Crimes and Vindication: Whose Wrong is it?. In: Dyson M (ed.). Unravelling Tort and Crime, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 146-173.|
|Abstract:||It is sometimes said that tort law provides for the vindication of individual rights — which raises the question of how tort law as thus understood should relate to criminal law, which is sometimes also said to be concerned with the vindication of rights. I discuss the differences between civil and criminal modes of vindication; the ways in which we might nonetheless blur the boundaries between the tort process and the criminal process; and the light that this can throw on the central core of criminal law.|
|Rights:||This material has been published in Unravelling Tort and Crime edited by Matthew Dyson, and has been reproduced by permission of Cambridge University Press.|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.