Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Social Sciences eTheses|
|Title: ||Working together? A survey of professional perceptions in child protection in England|
|Authors: ||Birchall, Elizabeth|
|Issue Date: ||1993|
|Publisher: ||University of Stirling|
|Abstract: ||This thesis presents findings from a postal survey in 1991, mainly in three diverse areas in the north of England. 339 members responded from six important professions in child protection: social workers, health visitors, teachers, police, general practitioners and paediatricians. The overall response rate was 60%. It explores practitioners' varied exposure to child protection training and experience of cases, their different severity ratings of brief
vignettes of abuse, their thoughts and action proposals and choice of contacts
in relation to an unfolding vignette, and their perceptions of local procedures and the functioning of their local child protection networks.
The work rests on a literature review published in 1991 under the title Coordination and Child Protection: a review of the literature by Christine Hallett and myself.
The general findings of the survey are that interprofessional cooperation and
coordination are well accepted tenets among workers in the system and that most informed respondents believe the system works fairly well, particularly in the assessment stage. However, many people, particularly among teachers and general practitioners, revealed an extremely limited involvement in or
knowledge of the system.
A complex network is revealed. Social workers, specialist police and consultant paediatricians clearly emerge as the core but health visitors appear to be a crucial bridge between frontline agencies and the core professions.
Many other professions and agencies appear to have peripheral or episodic involvement in cases.
Despite the generally favourable view of the system's functioning, many points of tension and conflict are evident. These range from discrepant evaluations of cases through many other factors to competing priorities and
resource shortfalls as obstacles to coordination.
A number of proposals to ameliorate some of these tensions are put forward.|
|Type: ||Thesis or Dissertation|
|Affiliation: ||School of Applied Social Science|
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.