Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21764
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNess, Hayleyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHancock, Peter J Ben_UK
dc.contributor.authorBowie, Leslieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBruce, Vickien_UK
dc.contributor.authorPike, Grahamen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-16T23:39:48Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-16T23:39:48Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/21764-
dc.description.abstractPurpose -The introduction of a new three-quarter-view female database in PROfit has enabled a careful consideration of view effects in facial composite construction. This article formally examines the impact of constructing full-face and three-quarter view composites under different encoding conditions. It also examines three-quarter view composites that have been automatically generated. Finally, this article investigates whether there is an identification benefit for presenting a full-face and three-quarter composite together.  Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents results from three experiments that examine the impact of encoding conditions on composite construction as well as the presentation of composites at the evaluation stage.  Findings - The results revealed that while standard full-face composites perform well when all views of the face have been encoded, care should be taken when a person has only seen one view. When a witness has seen a side view of a suspect, a three-quarter-view composite should be constructed. In addition, it would be beneficial for a witness to construct two composites of a suspect, one in full-face view and one in a three-quarter-view, particularly when the witness has only seen one view.  Research limitations/implications - This is the first study to examine viewpoint in facial composite construction. While a great deal of research has examined viewpoint dependency in face recognition tasks, composite construction is a reconstruction task involving both recall and recognition. The results indicate that there is a viewpoint effect that is similar to that described in the recognition literature. However, more research is needed in this area.  Practical implications - The practical implications of this research are that it is extremely important for facial composite operators in the field (police operators) to know who will make a good likeness of the target. Research such as this which examines real-life issues is incredibly important. This research shows that if a witness has seen all views of a perpetrator's face then standard composite construction using a full-face view will work well. However, if they have only seen a single view then it will not.  Originality/value - No research to date has examined the impact of viewpoint in facial composite construction.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherEmerald Insighten_UK
dc.relationNess H, Hancock PJB, Bowie L, Bruce V & Pike G (2015) Are two views better than one? Investigating three-quarter view facial composites. Journal of Forensic Practice, 17 (4), pp. 291-306. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/JFP-10-2014-0040; https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-10-2014-0040en_UK
dc.rightsPublisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Journal of Forensic Practice (2015), Vol. 17 Iss: 4, pp.291 - 306 by [publisher]. The original publication is available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/JFP-10-2014-0040en_UK
dc.subjectfacial compositeen_UK
dc.subjectthree-quarter viewen_UK
dc.subjectviewpointen_UK
dc.subjectPROfiten_UK
dc.subjecteyewitness memoryen_UK
dc.subjectforensic cognitionen_UK
dc.titleAre two views better than one? Investigating three-quarter view facial compositesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/JFP-10-2014-0040en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Forensic Practiceen_UK
dc.citation.issn2050-8794en_UK
dc.citation.volume17en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.spage291en_UK
dc.citation.epage306en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/JFP-10-2014-0040en_UK
dc.author.emailpjbh1@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date31/12/2015en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationThe Open Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCritical Insighten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationThe Open Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84946729360en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid599133en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6025-7068en_UK
dc.date.accepted2015-04-28en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-04-28en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2015-05-13en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorNess, Hayley|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHancock, Peter J B|0000-0001-6025-7068en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBowie, Leslie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBruce, Vicki|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPike, Graham|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2015-12-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2015-12-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2015-12-31|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameAre two views better than one.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2050-8794en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Are two views better than one.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version420.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.