Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21227
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGallopel-Morvan, Karineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMoodie, Crawforden_UK
dc.contributor.authorEker, Figenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBeguinot, Emmanuelleen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMartinet, Yvesen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-16T23:10:55Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-16T23:10:55Z-
dc.date.issued2015-03en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/21227-
dc.description.abstractBackground: We explored, for the first time, young adult roll-your-own smokers' response to using plain packaging in real-world settings. Methods: Naturalistic research was employed, where 133 French young adult smokers (18-25 years of age) used plain roll-your-own packs for 10 days; the plain packs they were provided with contained their usual brand of rolling tobacco and displayed the name of their usual brand. Participants were recruited in five cities in France (Paris, Marseille, Metz, Nantes, Toulouse) and completed two questionnaires to measure their response to their own branded packs and the plain packs. Both questionnaires assessed pack perceptions, brand attachment, product perceptions (eg, taste, quality, natural), feelings about smoking (satisfying, pleasurable), feelings when using the pack in front of others (embarrassment, image), warning response (credibility, awareness of risks) and smoking-related behaviour (eg, consumption, quitting). Results: Compared to their own fully branded packs, plain packs were associated with less positive pack and product perceptions, lower brand attachment and less positive feelings about smoking and feelings when using the pack in front of others. Participants were also more likely to report feeling like reducing consumption and quitting when using the plain packs, and more likely to feel like missing out on rolling a cigarette. No significant differences between the two pack types (plain and branded) were found in terms of credibility of warnings and perceptions of level of tar. Conclusions: The study suggests that the impacts of plain packaging for roll-your-own cigarette smokers are the same as for smokers of factory-made cigarettes.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_UK
dc.relationGallopel-Morvan K, Moodie C, Eker F, Beguinot E & Martinet Y (2015) Perceptions of plain packaging among young adult roll-your-own smokers in France: A naturalistic approach. Tobacco Control, 24 (e1) p. e44. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051513en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.titlePerceptions of plain packaging among young adult roll-your-own smokers in France: A naturalistic approachen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-12en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[RYO nat study_France.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051513en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleTobacco Controlen_UK
dc.citation.issn1468-3318en_UK
dc.citation.issn0964-4563en_UK
dc.citation.volume24en_UK
dc.citation.issuee1en_UK
dc.citation.epagee44en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailc.s.moodie@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date11/06/2014en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Rennesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFrench National Committee Against Tobacco (CNCT)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFrench National Committee Against Tobacco (CNCT)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity Henri Poincareen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000350131200008en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84902038102en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid614150en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1805-2509en_UK
dc.date.accepted2014-05-21en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-05-21en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2014-11-11en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorGallopel-Morvan, Karine|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMoodie, Crawford|0000-0002-1805-2509en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEker, Figen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBeguinot, Emmanuelle|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMartinet, Yves|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameRYO nat study_France.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0964-4563en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RYO nat study_France.pdfFulltext - Published Version109.05 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-12    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.