Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21221
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMathers, Johnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGrealy, Madeleine Aen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-25T23:22:01Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-25T23:22:01Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01en_UK
dc.identifier.other1005en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/21221-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated the strategies used by elite golfers to scale their putting actions to achieve putts of different distances. There were three aims; to determine if putting actions are scaled by manipulating swing amplitude as predicted by Craig et al. (2000), to establish the test-retest reliability of the Craig et al. model, and to evaluate whether elite golfers changed their putting scaling strategies when fatigued. Putting actions were recorded at baseline (time 1) and 6 months later (time 2) and after walking at 70% of maximum heart rate for 1 h (time 3). Participants performed a total of 80 putts which varied in distance (1 m, 2 m, 3 m, and 4 m) at time 1 and time 2, and 100 putts to the same distances when they were fatigued (time 3). Multiple regression was used to examine how the golfers systematically changed the movement control variables in the Craig et al. (2000) model to achieve golf putts of different distances. Although swing amplitude was a strong predictor of putterhead velocity at ball impact for all of the participants at baseline (time 1), each golfer systematically changed aspects of the timing of their action. A comparison of the regression models between time 1 and time 2 showed no significant changes in the scaling strategies used, indicating that the Craig et al. (2000) model had good test-retest reliability. Fatigue was associated with a decrease in the number of putts that were successfully holed and significant changes in the scaling strategies used by three of the golfers, along with a trend for increasing the putterhead velocity at ball impact. These motor control changes in performance when fatigued were evident in successful putts indicating that even when these elite golfers were able to achieve the goal of holing the putt, moderate levels of fatigue were influencing the consistency of their performance. Theoretical implications for the Craig et al. (2000) model and practical implications for elite golfers are discussed.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_UK
dc.relationMathers J & Grealy MA (2014) Motor control strategies and the effects of fatigue on golf putting performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Art. No.: 1005. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01005en_UK
dc.rights© 2014 Mathers and Grealy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectmotor controlen_UK
dc.subjectscaling strategyen_UK
dc.subjectmodelen_UK
dc.subjectfatigueen_UK
dc.subjectgolf puttingen_UK
dc.titleMotor control strategies and the effects of fatigue on golf putting performanceen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01005en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid24454298en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleFrontiers in Psychologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1664-1078en_UK
dc.citation.volume4en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailj.f.mathers@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Strathclydeen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000331260400001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84893613972en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid886051en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0261-2647en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-01-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2014-11-06en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMathers, John|0000-0002-0261-2647en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGrealy, Madeleine A|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2014-11-06en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2014-11-06|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameFrontiers 2014.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Frontiers 2014.pdfFulltext - Published Version610.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.