Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/20609
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMatthews, Peteren_UK
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-15T23:10:50Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-15T23:10:50Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/20609-
dc.description.abstractUrban regeneration policy has historically framed policy problems using a discourse that pathologises areas and spatial communities. Since 2001 in England, and 2002 in Scotland a structural change in policy has occurred where citywide partnerships are now meant overcome structural spatial inequalities, countering pathological explanations. This paper uses historical and discourse analysis to evaluate one of the major community regeneration strategies developed by the Scottish Executive in 2002: Better Communities in Scotland: Closing the Gap. It seeks to ask whether structural change in policy was paralleled by discursive change; what discursive path dependence is evidenced? The text is placed in the historic context of UK urban renewal policies dating back to the launch of the Urban Programme in 1968 and particularly the policy discourse created by the influential Conservative government policy of 1988 New Life for Urban Scotland and the wider discourses of poverty and neighbourhood renewal policy created by Labour governments since 1997. The close textual analysis of the text shows that Better Communities in Scotland continues to pathologise spatial communities. Although this suggests a degree of historical path dependency, the historic breadth of the analysis also problematises simple historical determinism.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_UK
dc.relationMatthews P (2010) Mind the gap? The persistence of pathological discourses in Urban regeneration policy. Housing, Theory and Society, 27 (3), pp. 221-240. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=yv4JPVwI&eid=2-s2.0-77955145924&md5=21895d3fa331248bb0536700362982cd; https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090903326452en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Housing, Theory and Society, Volume 27, Issue 3, 2010, pp. 221-240 copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14036090903326452en_UK
dc.subjectDiscourse analysisen_UK
dc.subjectRegenerationen_UK
dc.subjectScotlanden_UK
dc.subjectPolicy analysisen_UK
dc.subjectPath dependencyen_UK
dc.titleMind the gap? The persistence of pathological discourses in Urban regeneration policyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14036090903326452en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleHousing, Theory and Societyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1651-2278en_UK
dc.citation.issn1403-6096en_UK
dc.citation.volume27en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage221en_UK
dc.citation.epage240en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=yv4JPVwI&eid=2-s2.0-77955145924&md5=21895d3fa331248bb0536700362982cden_UK
dc.author.emailpeter.matthews@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSociology, Social Policy & Criminologyen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-77955145924en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid624660en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2014-1241en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2010-12-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2014-07-15en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMatthews, Peter|0000-0003-2014-1241en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2014-07-15en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2014-07-15|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameHTS - Mind The Gap PJM.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1403-6096en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
HTS - Mind The Gap PJM.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version505.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.