|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Mental Health Policy Making in England in the Risk Society. A Political Discourse Analysis|
|Citation:||Paterson B, McComish A, McIntosh I & Mason T (2013) Mental Health Policy Making in England in the Risk Society. A Political Discourse Analysis, Journal of Risk and Governance, 2 (3), pp. 147-158.|
|Abstract:||Safe Sound and Supportive the then new Labour Government's mental health strategy for England was launched in 1999. The launch confirmed a radical change with the emphasis moved from "libertarianism to coercion" (Holloway 1996:235). The stated aims of the new policy included reassurance for a public described as "understandably concerned about the risks of violence" and whose safety was to become "first priority at all times" (Department of Health 1999:7). It has been suggested that a number of events, particularly the deaths of Isabel Schwarz, a social worker killed by a mental health service user in 1984, the serious injuries suffered by Ben Silcock, filmed jumping into the Lion's den at London Zoo in 1992 and Jonathan Zito a member of the public killed in a random attack by a service users at a London Tube station in 1992 played a critical role. More particularly it has been argued that the framing of the latter event by newspapers as evidence of a widespread threat to public safety, had a causal influence that led to the prioritisation of public safety as a policy objective in English mental health services, (Rogers and Pilgrim 2001). This transformation positioned social concerns over clinical judgment (Crowe and Carlyle 2003) and ultimately altered not just the subjectivities of mental health practitioners including nurses but their practice reflected in subsequently soaring rates of compulsory admissions (Szmukler and Holloway 2000).|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|risk published discourse.pdf||141.31 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 31/12/2999 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.