Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/19908
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Essentialist Blindness would not preclude counterfactual knowledge
Authors: Roca-Royes, Sonia
Contact Email: sonia.rocaroyes@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Epistemology of counterfactuals
Epistemology of modality
Issue Date: 2012
Publisher: Kime Editions
Citation: Roca-Royes S (2012) Essentialist Blindness would not preclude counterfactual knowledge, Philosophia Scientiae, 16 (2), pp. 149-172.
Abstract: This paper does two things. First, it defends, against a potential threat to it, the claim that a capacity for essentialist knowledge should not be placed among the core capacities for counterfactual knowledge. Second, it assesses a consequence of that claim—or better: of the discussion by means of which I defend it—in relation to Kment's and Williamson's views on the relation between modality and counterfactuals.
Type: Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/19908
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/philosophiascientiae.745
Rights: The publisher has granted permission for use of this work in this Repository. Published in Philosophia Scientiae, 2012, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp. 149-172 by Kime Editions. The original publication can be found at: http://philosophiascientiae.revues.org/745
Affiliation: Philosophy

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Philosophia_Scientiae_EB&CK.pdf303.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.