|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Conference Papers and Proceedings|
|Peer Review Status:||Unrefereed|
|Title:||Mind-Independence and Modal Empiricism|
|Citation:||Roca-Royes S (2007) Mind-Independence and Modal Empiricism, Penco C, Vignolo M, Ottonelli V, Amoretti C (ed.) Proceedings of the 4th Latin Meeting in Analytic Philosophy (LMAP-2007), Genoa, Italy, September 20-22, 2007, Latin Meeting in Analytic Philosophy, Genoa, 20.9.2007 - 22.9.2007, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 117-135.|
|Series/Report no.:||CEUR-WS Proceedings, 278|
|Conference Name:||Latin Meeting in Analytic Philosophy|
|Abstract:||The paper focuses on the Epistemic Challenge for mind-independent accounts of modality. The challenge can be formulated as an inconsistency problem among three premises and, therefore, any strategy to meet the challenge will require the negation of (at least) one of its premises. The aim of the paper is not to offer a positive solution to the challenge, but rather to argue for the claim that to follow a hybrid strategy is probably the best way to meet it. With some qualifications, reasons are given as to why empiricism should be the way to meet the challenge as far as de re modality is concerned, whereas rationalism might be the correct way of addressing it for the case of de dicto modality.|
|Rights:||Author retains copyright|
|Mind_Independence_Empiricism.pdf||261.93 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.