Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status: ||Refereed|
|Title: ||McDowell, Transcendental Philosophy, and Naturalism|
|Authors: ||Haddock, Adrian|
|Contact Email: ||firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Issue Date: ||2009|
|Publisher: ||The University of Arkansas Press / University of Arkansas Department of Philosophy|
|Citation: ||Haddock A (2009) McDowell, Transcendental Philosophy, and Naturalism,
Philosophical Topics, 37 (1), pp. 63-76.|
|Abstract: ||First paragraph: I want to discuss the place of naturalism in the philosophy of
John McDowell. There are some people who think McDowell is a naturalist in name
only.1 But I think there is an aspect of his thinking which merits the title.
And I think it is an aspect he could well do without, in light of his recent
attempt to understand his own philosophy as a Hegelian radicalization of Kantian
|Type: ||Journal Article|
|Rights: ||The editor has granted permission for use of this article in this Repository. The article was first published in Philosophical Topics by The University of Arkansas Press / University of Arkansas Department of Philosophy.|
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.