Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/19599
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHope, Simonen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-24T23:41:22Z-
dc.date.available2014-03-24T23:41:22Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2013-05-01en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/19599-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper I assess the possibility of advancing a modern conception of social justice under neo-Aristotelian lights, focussing primarily on conceptions that assert a fundamental connection between social justice and eudaimonia. After some preliminary remarks on the extent to which a neo-Aristotelian account must stay close to Aristotle's own, I focus on Martha Nussbaum's sophisticated neo-Aristotelian approach, which I argue implausibly overworks the aspects of Aristotle's thought it appeals to. I then outline the shape of a deeper and more general, and as yet unanswered, problem facing neo-Aristotelian accounts: how to justify the claim that the point of a just society is to assist or enable its members to flourish.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSpringeren_UK
dc.relationHope S (2013) Neo-Aristotelian Social Justice: An Unanswered Question. Res Publica, 19 (2), pp. 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-013-9213-yen_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectAristotleen_UK
dc.subjectSocial justiceen_UK
dc.subjectEthical naturalismen_UK
dc.subjectNussbaumen_UK
dc.titleNeo-Aristotelian Social Justice: An Unanswered Questionen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-02en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Res Publica 2013(2).pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11158-013-9213-yen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleRes Publicaen_UK
dc.citation.issn1356-4765en_UK
dc.citation.volume19en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage157en_UK
dc.citation.epage172en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailsimonjames.hope@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPhilosophyen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84875532813en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid727109en_UK
dc.date.accepted2013-02-04en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-02-04en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2014-03-21en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHope, Simon|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-02en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameRes Publica 2013(2).pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1356-4765en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Res Publica 2013(2).pdfFulltext - Published Version201.25 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-02    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.