|Appears in Collections:||Economics Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Accounting for Negative, Zero and Positive Willingness to Pay for Landscape Change in a National Park|
|Citation:||Hanley N, Kristrom B & Watson F (2009) Accounting for Negative, Zero and Positive Willingness to Pay for Landscape Change in a National Park, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60 (1), pp. 1-16.|
|Abstract:||In contingent valuation, despite the fact that many externalities manifest themselves as costs to some and benefits to others, most studies restrict willingness to pay to being non-negative. In this paper, we investigate the impact of allowing for negative, zero and positive preferences for prospective changes in woodland cover in two UK national parks, the Lake District and the Trossachs. An extended spike model is used to accomplish this. The policy implications of not allowing for negative values in terms of aggregate benefits are also investigated, by comparing the extended spike model with a simple spike making use of only zero and positive bids, and a model which considers positive bids only. We find that ignoring negative values over-states the aggregate benefits of a woodland planting project by up to 44%.|
|Rights:||Published in Journal of Agricultural Economics. Copyright: Wiley-Blackwell / The Agricultural Economics Society.; The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com; Rights as indicated by the Exclusive Licence Form: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/pdf/jage_caf.pdf|
|HanleyetalJAE final final.doc||125.5 kB||Microsoft Word||View/Open|
|HanleyetalJAE final final.pdf||243.19 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.