|Appears in Collections:||Aquaculture Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Peptidoglycan, not endotoxin, is the key mediator of cytokine gene expression induced in rainbow trout macrophages by crude LPS|
Goetz, Frederick W
Inflammatory gene expression
|Citation:||MacKenzie S, Roher N, Boltana S & Goetz FW (2010) Peptidoglycan, not endotoxin, is the key mediator of cytokine gene expression induced in rainbow trout macrophages by crude LPS, Molecular Immunology, 47 (7-8), pp. 1450-1457.|
|Abstract:||In rainbow trout macrophages, phenol-extracted lipopolysaccharide (LPS) preparations stimulate proinflammatory cytokine gene expression but ultrapure preparations of LPS are inactive. Crude LPS preparations could potentially have a number of contaminants including peptidoglycans (PGNs), nucleic acids and lipoproteins. Thus, in the current study we individually tested potentially contaminating pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) on rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) macrophages to determine which ones could induce proinflammatory cytokine expression. We found that PGNs derived from Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli 0111:B4 and K12), are potent inducers of IL-1β and IL-6 gene expression and were equal to, or more potent than, crude LPS. On the other hand, PGNs of Gram-positive bacteria, DNA, RNA and lipoteichoic acid were weak stimulators, and lipid A, lipoprotein (Pam3CSK4) and ultrapure LPS were nonstimulatory. More importantly, crude LPS treated with lysozyme to degrade PGNs, exhibited greatly reduced activity in stimulating IL-1β and IL-6 gene expression, indicating that PGNs in the crude LPS are responsible for a significant amount of the proinflammatory activity. Finally, we showed that PGN treatment induces expression of COX-2 and the subsequent synthesis and release of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), an important mediator of inflammatory processes. The strong stimulatory effect of E. coli PGNs by themselves on trout macrophages suggests that the recognition of Gram-negative bacteria in trout is through PGNs in the bacterial wall, and indicates that the systems responsible for bacterial recognition in invertebrates (e.g., Drosophila) may also be conserved in some vertebrates.|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Mi.pdf||743.04 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 31/12/2999 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.