Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/18198
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Working Papers
Peer Review Status: Unrefereed
Title: Reformulating Mill’s Harm Principle
Authors: Saunders, Ben
Contact Email: ben.saunders@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Consent
Harm Principle
John Stuart Mill
On Liberty
Paternalism
State Regulation
Issue Date: 2013
Citation: Saunders B (2013) Reformulating Mill’s Harm Principle.
Abstract: Mill's harm principle is commonly supposed to rest on a distinction between self-regarding conduct, which is not liable to interference, and other-regarding conduct, which is. As critics have noted, this distinction is difficult to draw. Furthermore, some of Mill's own applications of the principle, such as his forbidding of slavery contracts, do not appear to fit with it. This article proposes that the self-regarding/other-regarding distinction is not in fact fundamental to Mill's harm principle; what he should have said is that intervention is permissible only to prevent non-consensual harm, regardless of where it falls. This explains both why some other-regarding conduct is immune to interventions and why some self-regarding conduct can be interfered with.
Type: Working or Discussion Paper
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/18198
Affiliation: Philosophy

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Reformulating .pdf392.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.