|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Duty of Confidentiality: Myth or Reality?|
|Publisher:||Sweet and Maxwell|
|Citation:||Yu H (2012) Duty of Confidentiality: Myth or Reality?, Civil Justice Quarterly, 31 (1), pp. 68-88.|
|Abstract:||Explores the extent to which there is a duty of confidentiality in relation to the information used in arbitration proceedings. Considers how the duty is regulated by arbitration rules in different countries and whether there is a sufficient consensus to develop an internationally accepted principle of duty of confidentiality. Discusses which jurisdictions have an implied duty of confidentiality in the parties' arbitration agreement. Looks at how confidential information is defined in different jurisdictions, who is bound by the duty of confidentiality and the exceptions to the duty.|
|Rights:||The publisher has granted permission for use of this work in this Repository. Published in Civil Justice Quarterly, 2012, 31(1), pp.68-88 by Sweet and Maxwell.|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.