|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Who is an arbitrator? A study into the issue of immunity|
Immunity from suit
International commercial arbitration
|Publisher:||Sweet and Maxwell|
|Citation:||Yu H (2009) Who is an arbitrator? A study into the issue of immunity, International Arbitration Law Review, 12 (2), pp. 3-10.|
|Abstract:||Reviews the importance of judicial immunity from negligence actions in the UK and US, considers the extent to which such immunity also extends to arbitrators and reflects on the basis for such an extension. Evaluates the possible contractual basis for arbitrator immunity under an agency relationship with the parties and the arguments for arbitrator immunity based upon their quasi-juridical role. Assesses the extent to which the theories are borne out by UK and US cases involving questions of arbitrator immunity.|
|Rights:||The publisher has not yet responded to our queries therefore this work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Notes:||Cases cited: Sutcliffe v Thackrah  A.C. 727 (HL)|
|Hong-Lin Yu Int ALR 2009.pdf||327.69 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 31/12/2999 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.