|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||How far can party autonomy be stretched in setting the grounds for the refusal of arbitral awards|
|Publisher:||Sweet and Maxwell|
|Citation:||Yu H (2011) How far can party autonomy be stretched in setting the grounds for the refusal of arbitral awards, International Arbitration Law Review, 14 (5), pp. 156-161.|
|Abstract:||Explores the Belgian, Swiss and US attitudes towards the relationship between the statutory grounds for recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards under domestic law and the contractual agreement between the parties to an arbitration to restrict or expand the grounds for recognising and enforcing such awards, in order to assess the extent to which party autonomy may be stretched.|
|Rights:||The publisher has not yet responded to our queries therefore this work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Hong-Lin Yu Int ALR 2011.pdf||279.74 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 31/12/2999 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.