|Appears in Collections:||Aquaculture Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Assessing reproductive condition in captive and wild common snook stocks: A comparison between the wet mount technique and histological preparations|
Neidig, Carole L
Grier, Harry J
Main, Kevan L
|Publisher:||Taylor and Francis|
|Citation:||Rhody N, Neidig CL, Grier HJ, Main KL & Migaud H (2013) Assessing reproductive condition in captive and wild common snook stocks: A comparison between the wet mount technique and histological preparations, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 142 (4), pp. 979-988.|
|Abstract:||We describe oocyte development in Common Snook Centropomus undecimalis and, secondarily, present results from a comparison of the wet mount technique with histological preparations of ovarian biopsies. Potential differences in ovarian development between wild and captive broodstock were investigated. Results showed that mean oocyte diameter (μm) was not statistically different between the two groups or within each defined stage and step of reproductive condition. Histological preparations were used to validate the wet mount technique as a rapid, yet accurate, low-cost alternative for assessing reproductive condition in Common Snook. When compared with histology, the wet mount provided a precise method for determining whether female broodstock were candidates for hormone induction in aquaculture applications. However, due to the loss of fine resolution, it was not possible to identify cortical alveoli, oocyte atresia, and postovulatory follicle complexes by using the wet mount technique. Despite these limitations, findings from this study indicate that the wet mount technique may have applications in fishery biology as a noninvasive method for assessing reproductive condition in wild fish stocks.|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Affiliation:||Mote Marine Laboratory|
Mote Marine Laboratory
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Mote Marine Laboratory
|Rhoidy et al Trans 2013.pdf||1.42 MB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 31/12/2999 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.