Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/16723
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaxton, Tamsin Ken_UK
dc.contributor.authorDeBruine, Lisa Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorJones, Benedict Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLittle, Anthonyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, S Craigen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-26T23:14:58Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-26T23:14:58Z-
dc.date.issued2013-07en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/16723-
dc.description.abstractAn evolutionary approach to attractiveness judgments emphasi ses that many human trait preferences exist in order to assist adaptive mate choice. Here we test an adaptive development hypothesis, whereby voice pitch preferences indicating potential mate quality might arise or strengthen significantly during adolesce nce (when mate choice becomes adaptive). We used a longitudinal study of 250 adolescents to investigate changes in preferenc e for voice pitch, a proposed marker of mate quality. We found signif- icantly stronger preferences for lower-pitched opposite-sex voices in the older age group compared with the younger age group (using different sets of age-matched stimuli), and marginally increased prefer- ences for lower-pitched opposite-sex voices comparing within-participant preferences for the same set of stimuli over the course of 1 year. We also found stability in individual differenc es in preferences across adolesce nce: controlling for age, the raters who had stronger preferences than their peers for lower- pitched voices when first tested, retained stronger preferences for lower-pitched voices relative to their peers about 1 year later. Adolescence provides a useful arena for evaluating adaptive hypotheses and testing the cues that might give rise to adaptive behaviour.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationSaxton TK, DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Little A & Roberts SC (2013) Voice pitch preferences of adolescents: Do changes across time indicate a shift towards potentially adaptive adult-like preferences?. Personality and Individual Differences, 55 (2), pp. 90-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.009en_UK
dc.rightsPublished in Personality and Individual Differences by Elsevier; Elsevier believes that individual authors should be able to distribute their accepted author manuscripts for their personal voluntary needs and interests, e.g. posting to their websites or their institution’s repository, e-mailing to colleagues. The Elsevier Policy is as follows: Authors retain the right to use the accepted author manuscript for personal use, internal institutional use and for permitted scholarly posting provided that these are not for purposes of commercial use or systematic distribution. An "accepted author manuscript" is the author’s version of the manuscript of an article that has been accepted for publication and which may include any author-incorporated changes suggested through the processes of submission processing, peer review, and editor-author communications.en_UK
dc.subjectAdolescenceen_UK
dc.subjectAttractionen_UK
dc.subjectAttractiveness judgmentsen_UK
dc.subjectPitchen_UK
dc.subjectVocal attractivenessen_UK
dc.subjectVoiceen_UK
dc.subjectevolutionary psychologyen_UK
dc.subjectmate choiceen_UK
dc.titleVoice pitch preferences of adolescents: Do changes across time indicate a shift towards potentially adaptive adult-like preferences?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.009en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePersonality and Individual Differencesen_UK
dc.citation.issn0191-8869en_UK
dc.citation.volume55en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage90en_UK
dc.citation.epage94en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderRoyal Societyen_UK
dc.author.emailcraig.roberts@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Liverpoolen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000319091900002en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84876814373en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid677728en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
dc.date.accepted2013-02-12en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-02-12en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-09-25en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectEvolutionary Approaches to Face Perceptionen_UK
dc.relation.funderref0en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorSaxton, Tamsin K|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDeBruine, Lisa M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJones, Benedict C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLittle, Anthony|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoberts, S Craig|0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
local.rioxx.project0|Royal Society|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000288en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2013-09-25en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2013-09-25|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamePAID-D-12-00840R1 - as submitted.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0191-8869en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PAID-D-12-00840R1 - as submitted.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version320.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.