Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/1661
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: 100 years of change: examining agricultural trends, habitat change and stakeholder perceptions through the 20th century
Authors: Dallimer, Martin
Tinch, Dugald
Acs, Szvetlana
Hanley, Nicholas
Southall, Humphrey R
Gaston, Kevin J
Armsworth, Paul R
Contact Email: n.d.hanley@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: landscape history
agriculture
Issue Date: Apr-2009
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell / British Ecological Society
Citation: Dallimer M, Tinch D, Acs S, Hanley N, Southall HR, Gaston KJ & Armsworth PR (2009) 100 years of change: examining agricultural trends, habitat change and stakeholder perceptions through the 20th century, Journal of Applied Ecology, 46 (2), pp. 334-343.
Abstract: 1. The 20th century has witnessed substantial increases in the intensity of agricultural land management, much of which has been driven by policies to enhance food security and production. The knock-on effects in agriculturally dominated landscapes include habitat degradation and biodiversity loss. We examine long-term patterns of agricultural and habitat change at a regional scale, using the Peak District of northern England as a case study. As stakeholders are central to the implementation of successful land-use policy, we also assess their perceptions of historical changes. 2. In the period 1900 to 2000, there was a fivefold rise in sheep density, along with higher cattle density. We found a reduction in the number of farms, evidence of a shift in land ownership patterns, and increased agricultural specialization, including the virtual disappearance of upland arable production. 3. Despite previous studies showing a substantial loss in heather cover, we found that there had been no overall change in the proportion of land covered by dwarf shrub moor. Nonetheless, turnover rates were high, with only 55% of sampled sites maintaining dwarf shrub moor coverage between 1913 and 2000. 4. Stakeholders identified many of the changes revealed by the historical data, such as increased sheep numbers, fewer farms and greater specialization. However, other land-use changes were not properly described. For instance, although there had been no overall change in the proportion of dwarf shrub moor and the size of the rural labour force had not fallen, stakeholders reported a decline in both. Spatial heterogeneity of the changes, shifting baselines and problems with historical data sources might account for some of these discrepancies. 5. Synthesis and applications. A marked increase in sheep numbers, combined with general agricultural intensification, have been the dominant land-use processes in the Peak District during the 20th century. Stakeholders only correctly perceived some land-use changes. Policy and management objectives should therefore be based primarily on actual historical evidence. However, understanding stakeholder perceptions and how they differ from, or agree with, the available evidence will contribute to the successful uptake of land management policies and partly determine the costs of policy implementation.
Type: Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/1661
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01619.x
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author; you can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Affiliation: University of Sheffield
Economics
Economics
Economics
University of Portsmouth
University of Sheffield
University of Sheffield

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dallimeretal_History_2009.pdf659.25 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 31/12/2999     Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.