|Appears in Collections:||History and Politics Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Venue Shift Following Devolution: When Reserved Meets Devolved in Scotland|
|Publisher:||Taylor and Francisw|
|Citation:||Cairney P (2006) Venue Shift Following Devolution: When Reserved Meets Devolved in Scotland, Regional and Federal Studies, 16 (4), pp. 429-445.|
|Abstract:||This article examines the means used to address blurred or shifting boundaries between reserved UK and devolved Scottish policy. It outlines the main issues of multi-level governance and intergovernmental relations in Scotland and the initial problems faced in identifying responsibility for policy action. While it suggests that legislative ambiguities are now mainly resolved with the use of ‘Sewel motions', it highlights cases of Scottish action in reserved areas, including the example of smoking policy in which the Scottish Executive appears to ‘commandeer' a previously reserved issue. However, most examples of new Scottish influence suggest the need for UK support or minimal UK interest.|
|Rights:||This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Regional & Federal Studies, Volume 16, Issue 4, 2006, pp.429-445 copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13597560600989029|
|Venue Shift Following Devolution 2006.pdf||277.2 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.