Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/15975
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNilsen, Peren_UK
dc.contributor.authorStahl, Christianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoback, Kerstinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCairney, Paulen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-09T00:20:22Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-09T00:20:22Z-
dc.date.issued2013-06-10en_UK
dc.identifier.other63en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/15975-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Many of society's health problems require research-based knowledge acted on by healthcare practitioners together with implementation of political measures from governmental agencies. However, there has been limited knowledge exchange between implementation science and policy implementation research, which has been conducted since the early 1970s. Based on a narrative review of selective literature on implementation science and policy implementation research, the aim of this paper is to describe the characteristics of policy implementation research, analyze key similarities and differences between this field and implementation science, and discuss how knowledge assembled in policy implementation research could inform implementation science. Discussion: Following a brief overview of policy implementation research, several aspects of the two fields were described and compared: the purpose and origins of the research; the characteristics of the research; the development and use of theory; determinants of change (independent variables); and the impact of implementation (dependent variables). The comparative analysis showed that there are many similarities between the two fields, yet there are also profound differences. Still, important learning may be derived from several aspects of policy implementation research, including issues related to the influence of the context of implementation and the values and norms of the implementers (the healthcare practitioners) on implementation processes. Relevant research on various associated policy topics, including The Advocacy Coalition Framework, Governance Theory, and Institutional Theory, may also contribute to improved understanding of the difficulties of implementing evidence in healthcare. Implementation science is at a relatively early stage of development, and advancement of the field would benefit from accounting for knowledge beyond the parameters of the immediate implementation science literature. Summary: There are many common issues in policy implementation research and implementation science. Research in both fields deals with the challenges of translating intentions into desired changes. Important learning may be derived from several aspects of policy implementation research.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden_UK
dc.relationNilsen P, Stahl C, Roback K & Cairney P (2013) Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research. Implementation Science, 8 (1), Art. No.: 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-63en_UK
dc.rights© 2013 Nilsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/en_UK
dc.subjectPolicyen_UK
dc.subjectImplementationen_UK
dc.subjectTop-downen_UK
dc.subjectBottom-upen_UK
dc.subjectDeterminantsen_UK
dc.subjectContexten_UK
dc.subjectInterdisciplinarityen_UK
dc.titleNever the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation researchen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1748-5908-8-63en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleImplementation Scienceen_UK
dc.citation.issn1748-5908en_UK
dc.citation.volume8en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailp.a.cairney@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLinkoping Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLinkoping Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLinkoping Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPoliticsen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000320714700001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84878690654en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid690480en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9956-832Xen_UK
dc.date.accepted2013-05-29en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-05-29en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-07-24en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorNilsen, Per|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorStahl, Christian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoback, Kerstin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCairney, Paul|0000-0002-9956-832Xen_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2013-07-24en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/|2013-07-24|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameNever the twain shall meet.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:History and Politics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Never the twain shall meet.pdfFulltext - Published Version264.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.