Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/15637
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPaley, Johnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLilford, Richard Jen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-26T00:43:37Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-26T00:43:37Z-
dc.date.issued2011-04-30en_UK
dc.identifier.otherd424en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/15637-
dc.description.abstractAre qualitative and quantitative research really based on different philosophies? John Paley and Richard Lilford argue that the idea that qualitative research is constructivist should not be allowed to diffuse into medical literature unopposed.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_UK
dc.relationPaley J & Lilford RJ (2011) Qualitative methods: An alternative view. BMJ, 342 (7804), pp. 956-958, Art. No.: d424. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d424en_UK
dc.rightsPublisher is open-access. Open access publishing allows free access to and distribution of published articles where the author retains copyright of their work by employing a Creative Commons attribution licence. Proper attribution of authorship and correct citation details should be given. BMJ 2011; 342 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d424 (Published 9 February 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;342:d424en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/en_UK
dc.subjectSocial sciences Research Methodologyen_UK
dc.titleQualitative methods: An alternative viewen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmj.d424en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid21307109en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMJen_UK
dc.citation.issn1756-1833en_UK
dc.citation.issn0959-8138en_UK
dc.citation.volume342en_UK
dc.citation.issue7804en_UK
dc.citation.spage956en_UK
dc.citation.epage958en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailj.h.paley@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date09/02/2011en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Health - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Birminghamen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000287402900014en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-79955548355en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid887738en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2011-02-09en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-06-20en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorPaley, John|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLilford, Richard J|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2013-06-20en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/|2013-06-20|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameQualitative methods alternative view.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0959-8138en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Qualitative methods alternative view.pdfFulltext - Published Version383.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.