Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/15636
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Spirituality and reductionism: Three replies
Authors: Paley, John
Contact Email: j.h.paley@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: spirituality
reductionism
psychology
ideology
ethics
faith
Issue Date: Jul-2010
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Citation: Paley J (2010) Spirituality and reductionism: Three replies. Nursing Philosophy, 11 (3), pp. 178-190.
Abstract: Several authors have commented on my reductionist account of spirituality in nursing, describing it variously as naïve, disrespectful, demeaning, paternalistic, arrogant, reifying, indicative of a closed mind, akin to positivism, a procrustean bed, a perpetuation of fraud, a matter of faith, an attempt to secure ideological power, and a perspective that puritanically forbids interesting philosophical topics. In responding to this list of felonies and misdemeanours, I try to justify my excesses by arguing that the critics have not really understood what reductionism involves; that rejecting reductionism is not the same as providing arguments against it; that the ethical dilemmas allegedly associated with reductionist views are endemic to health care; that ‘reifying’ is what believers in the spiritual realm do; and that the closed minds belong to those who dismiss reductionist science without having studied its achievements.
Type: Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/15636
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2010.00439.x
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Notes: Comments on: Leget C. (2008) Spirituality and nursing: why be reductionist? A response to John Paley. Nursing Philosophy, 9, 277– 278. Betts C.E. & Smith-Betts A.F.J. (2009) Scientism and the medicalization of existential distress: a reply to John Paley. Nursing Philosophy, 10, 137–141. Nolan S. (2009) In defence of the indefensible: an alternative to John Paley’s reductionist, atheistic, psychological alternative to spirituality. Nursing Philosophy, 10, 203– 213.
Affiliation: HS Health - Stirling

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Spirituality three replies.pdf109.82 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 31/12/2999     Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.