Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/15501
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStreet, Lorna Een_UK
dc.contributor.authorSubke, Jens-Arneen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSommerkorn, Martinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSloan, Victoriaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDucrotoy, Heleneen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPhoenix, Gareth Ken_UK
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Mathewen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-17T23:23:48Z-
dc.date.available2013-06-17T23:23:48Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2013-07en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/15501-
dc.description.abstract- The Arctic is already experiencing changes in plant community composition, so understanding the contribution of different vegetation components to carbon (C) cycling is essential in order to accurately quantify ecosystem C balance. Mosses contribute substantially to biomass, but their impact on carbon use efficiency (CUE) - the proportion of gross primary productivity (GPP) incorporated into growth - and aboveground versus belowground C partitioning is poorly known. - We used 13C pulse-labelling to trace assimilated C in mosses (Sphagnum sect. Acutifolia and Pleurozium schreberi) and in dwarf shrub-P. schreberi vegetation in sub-Arctic Finland. Based on 13C pools and fluxes, we quantified the contribution of mosses to GPP, CUE and partitioning. - Mosses incorporated 20 ± 9% of total ecosystem GPP into biomass. CUE of Sphagnum was 68-71%, that of P. schreberi was 62-81% and that of dwarf shrub-P. schreberi vegetation was 58-74%. Incorporation of C belowground was 10 ± 2% of GPP, while vascular plants alone incorporated 15 ± 4% of their fixed C belowground. - We have demonstrated that mosses strongly influence C uptake and retention in Arctic dwarf shrub vegetation. They increase CUE, and the fraction of GPP partitioned aboveground. Arctic C models must include mosses to accurately represent ecosystem C dynamics.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell for New Phytologist Trusten_UK
dc.relationStreet LE, Subke J, Sommerkorn M, Sloan V, Ducrotoy H, Phoenix GK & Williams M (2013) The role of mosses in carbon uptake and partitioning in arctic vegetation. New Phytologist, 199 (1), pp. 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12285en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectbelowgrounden_UK
dc.subjectbiomassen_UK
dc.subjectbryophyteen_UK
dc.subjectcarbon allocationen_UK
dc.subjectcarbon use efficiencyen_UK
dc.subjectCO2 fluxen_UK
dc.subjectgross primary productivity (GPP)en_UK
dc.subjecttundraen_UK
dc.subjectForest soils Northern Hemisphereen_UK
dc.subjectSoil ecology Northern Hemisphereen_UK
dc.subjectSoil chemistry Northern Hemisphereen_UK
dc.subjectForests and forestry Northern Hemisphereen_UK
dc.titleThe role of mosses in carbon uptake and partitioning in arctic vegetationen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-01-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Street et al 2013_NewPhyt.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nph.12285en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleNew Phytologisten_UK
dc.citation.issn1469-8137en_UK
dc.citation.issn0028-646Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume199en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage163en_UK
dc.citation.epage175en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailjens-arne.subke@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationThe James Hutton Instituteen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sheffielden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sheffielden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84878351997en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid697732en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9244-639Xen_UK
dc.date.accepted2013-03-14en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-03-14en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-06-17en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorStreet, Lorna E|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSubke, Jens-Arne|0000-0001-9244-639Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorSommerkorn, Martin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSloan, Victoria|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDucrotoy, Helene|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPhoenix, Gareth K|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWilliams, Mathew|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-01-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameStreet et al 2013_NewPhyt.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0028-646Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Street et al 2013_NewPhyt.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.04 MBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.