Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/15303
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles |
Title: | The case for a global ban on asbestos |
Author(s): | LaDou, Joseph Castleman, Barry Frank, Arthur Gochfeld, Michael Greenberg, Morris Huff, James Joshi, Tushar Kant Landrigan, Philip J Lemen, Richard Myers, Jonny Soffritti, Morando Soskolne, Colin L Takahashi, Ken Teitelbaum, Daniel Terracini, Benedetto Watterson, Andrew |
Contact Email: | a.e.watterson@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | asbestos asbestos cancer pandemic asbestos-related diseases ban cancer chrysotile controlled use disinformation mesothelioma product defense Asbestos Safety education, Industrial Industrial safety |
Issue Date: | Jul-2010 |
Date Deposited: | 10-Jun-2013 |
Citation: | LaDou J, Castleman B, Frank A, Gochfeld M, Greenberg M, Huff J, Joshi TK, Landrigan PJ, Lemen R, Myers J, Soffritti M, Soskolne CL, Takahashi K, Teitelbaum D, Terracini B & Watterson A (2010) The case for a global ban on asbestos (Commentary). Environmental Health Perspectives, 118 (7), pp. 897-901. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002285 |
Abstract: | Background: All forms of asbestos are now banned in 52 countries. Safer products have replaced many materials that once were made with it. Nonetheless, many countries still use, import, and export asbestos and asbestos-containing products, and in those that have banned other forms of asbestos, the so-called "controlled use" of chrysotile asbestos is often exempted from the ban. In fact, chrysotile has accounted for > 95% of all the asbestos used globally. Objective: We examined and evaluated the literature used to support the exemption of chrysotile asbestos from the ban and how its exemption reflects the political and economic influence of the asbestos mining and manufacturing industry. Discussion: All forms of asbestos, including chrysotile, are proven human carcinogens. All forms cause malignant mesothelioma and lung and laryngeal cancers, and may cause ovarian, gastrointestinal, and other cancers. No exposure to asbestos is without risk. Illnesses and deaths from asbestos exposure are entirely preventable. Conclusions: All countries of the world have an obligation to their citizens to join in the international endeavor to ban the mining, manufacture, and use of all forms of asbestos. An international ban is urgently needed. There is no medical or scientific basis to exempt chrysotile from the worldwide ban of asbestos. |
DOI Link: | 10.1289/ehp.1002285 |
Rights: | Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives. Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Environ Health Perspect. 2010 July; 118(7): 897–901. Published online 2010 July 1. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002285 by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). |
Notes: | Output Type: Commentary |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Global ban on asbestos commentary_2010.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 179.08 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.