Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/15303
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Title: The case for a global ban on asbestos (Commentary)
Authors: LaDou, Joseph
Castleman, Barry
Frank, Arthur
Gochfeld, Michael
Greenberg, Morris
Huff, James
Joshi, Tushar Kant
Landrigan, Philip J
Lemen, Richard
Myers, Jonny
Soffritti, Morando
Soskolne, Colin L
Takahashi, Ken
Teitelbaum, Daniel
Terracini, Benedetto
Watterson, Andrew
Contact Email: a.e.watterson@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: asbestos
asbestos cancer pandemic
asbestos-related diseases
ban
cancer
chrysotile
controlled use
disinformation
mesothelioma
product defense
Issue Date: Jul-2010
Publisher: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
Citation: LaDou J, Castleman B, Frank A, Gochfeld M, Greenberg M, Huff J, Joshi TK, Landrigan PJ, Lemen R, Myers J, Soffritti M, Soskolne CL, Takahashi K, Teitelbaum D, Terracini B & Watterson A (2010) The case for a global ban on asbestos (Commentary), Environmental Health Perspectives, 118 (7), pp. 897-901.
Abstract: Background: All forms of asbestos are now banned in 52 countries. Safer products have replaced many materials that once were made with it. Nonetheless, many countries still use, import, and export asbestos and asbestos-containing products, and in those that have banned other forms of asbestos, the so-called "controlled use" of chrysotile asbestos is often exempted from the ban. In fact, chrysotile has accounted for > 95% of all the asbestos used globally. Objective: We examined and evaluated the literature used to support the exemption of chrysotile asbestos from the ban and how its exemption reflects the political and economic influence of the asbestos mining and manufacturing industry. Discussion: All forms of asbestos, including chrysotile, are proven human carcinogens. All forms cause malignant mesothelioma and lung and laryngeal cancers, and may cause ovarian, gastrointestinal, and other cancers. No exposure to asbestos is without risk. Illnesses and deaths from asbestos exposure are entirely preventable. Conclusions: All countries of the world have an obligation to their citizens to join in the international endeavor to ban the mining, manufacture, and use of all forms of asbestos. An international ban is urgently needed. There is no medical or scientific basis to exempt chrysotile from the worldwide ban of asbestos.
Type: Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/15303
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002285
Rights: Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives. Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Environ Health Perspect. 2010 July; 118(7): 897–901. Published online 2010 July 1. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002285 by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS).
Affiliation: University of California
Independent
Drexel University
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
HM Inspector of Factories
Health and Environmental Sciences Institute
Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, India
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
University of Cape Town
European Foundation for Oncology and Environmental Sciences, Italy
University of Alberta
University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
University of Colorado
University of Torino, Italy
HS Research - Stirling

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Global ban on asbestos commentary_2010.pdf179.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.