|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Choice of the Proper Law vs. Public Policy|
|Citation:||Yu H (2008) Choice of the Proper Law vs. Public Policy, Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 1 (1), pp. 107-148.|
|Abstract:||The issue surrounding the choice of the proper law was analysed from three aspects: the advantages of international commercial arbitration; the expectations of the parties; and the arbitrator's point of view. Only by ascertaining the proper law of the contract can the disputes be properly decided and the award be enforced. However, the choice of the proper law sometimes can be interpreted as contradicting public policy or mandatory rules and condemned as invalid in terms of the choice of itself and the contents of the choice. This is especially the case of the choice of a-national principles. Following the examination of the development and the application of a-national principles in different jurisdictions, while the notion of a-national principles has been developed or applied in the Western arbitration, China and Taiwan has failed to utilise statutes to give a clear acceptance of a-national principles in China and the new lex mercatoria in Taiwan respectively.|
|Rights:||The publisher has not responded to our queries therefore this work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author; you can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Yu 1 - 2008.pdf||307.41 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 31/12/2999 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.