1. STORRE
  2. Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport
  3. Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/13000
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPaterson, Brodieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDuxbury, Joyen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-29T00:05:59Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-29T00:05:59Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2007-07en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/13000-
dc.description.abstractRestraint as an intervention in the management of acute mental distress has a long history that predates the existence of psychiatry. However, it remains a source of controversy with an ongoing debate as to its role. This article critically explores what to date has seemingly been only implicit in the debate surrounding the role of restraint: how should the concept of validity be interpreted when applied to restraint as an intervention? The practice of restraint in mental health is critically examined using two post-positivist constructions of validity, the pragmatic and the psychopolitical, by means of a critical examination of the literature. The current literature provides only weak support for the pragmatic validity of restraint as an intervention and no support to date for its psychopolitical validity. Judgements regarding the validity of any intervention that is coercive must include reference to the psychopolitical dimensions of both practice and policy.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_UK
dc.relationPaterson B & Duxbury J (2007) Restraint and the question of validity. Nursing Ethics, 14 (4), pp. 535-545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733007077888en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectInpatienten_UK
dc.subjectMentalen_UK
dc.subjectPsychiatricen_UK
dc.subjectRestrainten_UK
dc.subjectValidityen_UK
dc.subjectViolenceen_UK
dc.subjectaggressionen_UK
dc.subjectarticleen_UK
dc.subjectattitude to healthen_UK
dc.subjectcounter transferenceen_UK
dc.subjectdecision makingen_UK
dc.subjectethicsen_UK
dc.subjectevidence based medicineen_UK
dc.subjectexerciseen_UK
dc.subjecthealth personnel attitudeen_UK
dc.subjecthumanen_UK
dc.subjectlegal aspecten_UK
dc.subjectmental diseaseen_UK
dc.subjectnurse attitudeen_UK
dc.subjectnursing evaluation researchen_UK
dc.subjectoccupational healthen_UK
dc.subjectorganization and managementen_UK
dc.subjectpatient advocacyen_UK
dc.subjectpersuasive communicationen_UK
dc.subjectphilosophyen_UK
dc.subjectpoliticsen_UK
dc.subjectpsychiatric nursingen_UK
dc.subjectpsychological aspecten_UK
dc.subjectsafetyen_UK
dc.subjectstandarden_UK
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen_UK
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_UK
dc.subjectAttitude of Health Personnelen_UK
dc.subjectCoercionen_UK
dc.subjectCountertransference (Psychology)en_UK
dc.subjectEvidence-Based Medicineen_UK
dc.subjectGreat Britainen_UK
dc.subjectHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practiceen_UK
dc.subjectHumansen_UK
dc.subjectJudgmenten_UK
dc.subjectMental Disordersen_UK
dc.subjectNurse's Roleen_UK
dc.subjectPhilosophy, Nursingen_UK
dc.subjectPostmodernismen_UK
dc.subjectRestraint, Physicalen_UK
dc.subjectSafety Managementen_UK
dc.subjectNursing ethicsen_UK
dc.titleRestraint and the question of validityen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-12en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Paterson_2007_Restraint_and_the_Question_of_Validity.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0969733007077888en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid17562732en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleNursing Ethicsen_UK
dc.citation.issn1477-0989en_UK
dc.citation.issn0969-7330en_UK
dc.citation.volume14en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.spage535en_UK
dc.citation.epage545en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailb.a.paterson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date11/06/2007en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Research - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Central Lancashireen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000247870900011en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-34347225970en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid705177en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2007-06-11en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-05-20en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorPaterson, Brodie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDuxbury, Joy|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamePaterson_2007_Restraint_and_the_Question_of_Validity.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0969-7330en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Paterson_2007_Restraint_and_the_Question_of_Validity.pdfFulltext - Published Version117.92 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-12    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright

View License
Show simple item record


Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.