Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Neurology out-patients with symptoms unexplained by disease: Illness beliefs and financial benefits predict 1-year outcome
Authors: Sharpe, Michael C
Stone, Jon C
Hibberd, Carina
Warlow, Charles P
Duncan, Roderick D D
Coleman, Richard J
Roberts, Richard C
Cull, Roger E
Pelosi, Anthony J
Cavanagh, Jonathan T O
Matthews, Keith B
Goldbeck, Rainer
Smyth, Roger
Walker, Andrew
Walker, Jane K
MacMahon, A D
Murray, Gordon
Carson, Alan J
Contact Email:
Keywords: Cohort study
medically unexplained symptoms
Issue Date: Apr-2010
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Citation: Sharpe MC, Stone JC, Hibberd C, Warlow CP, Duncan RDD, Coleman RJ, Roberts RC, Cull RE, Pelosi AJ, Cavanagh JTO, Matthews KB, Goldbeck R, Smyth R, Walker A, Walker JK, MacMahon AD, Murray G & Carson AJ (2010) Neurology out-patients with symptoms unexplained by disease: Illness beliefs and financial benefits predict 1-year outcome, Psychological Medicine, 40 (4), pp. 689-698.
Abstract: Background: Patients whose symptoms are 'unexplained by disease' often have a poor symptomatic outcome after specialist consultation, but we know little about which patient factors predict this. We therefore aimed to determine predictors of poor subjective outcome for new neurology out-patients with symptoms unexplained by disease 1 year after the initial consultation. Method: The Scottish Neurological Symptom Study was a 1-year prospective cohort study of patients referred to secondary care National Health Service neurology clinics in Scotland (UK). Patients were included if the neurologist rated their symptoms as 'not at all' or only 'somewhat explained' by organic disease. Patient-rated change in health was rated on a five-point Clinical Global Improvement (CGI) scale ('much better' to 'much worse') 1 year later. Results: The 12-month outcome data were available on 716 of 1144 patients (63%). Poor outcome on the CGI ('unchanged', 'worse' or 'much worse') was reported by 482 (67%) out of 716 patients. The only strong independent baseline predictors were patients' beliefs [expectation of non-recovery (odds ratio [OR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-2.96), non-attribution of symptoms to psychological factors (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.51-3.26)] and the receipt of illness-related financial benefits (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.37-3.86). Together, these factors predicted 13% of the variance in outcome. Conclusions: Of the patients, two-thirds had a poor outcome at 1 year. Illness beliefs and financial benefits are more useful in predicting poor outcome than the number of symptoms, disability and distress.
Type: Journal Article
DOI Link:
Rights: Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Psychological Medicine / Volume 40 / Issue 04 / April 2010, pp 689-698 Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009 DOI:
Affiliation: University of Edinburgh
University of Edinburgh
NMAHP Research
University of Edinburgh
Southern General Hospital
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
University of Dundee
University of Edinburgh
Hairmyres Hospital, East Kilbride
University of Glasgow
University of Dundee
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
University of Glasgow
University of Edinburgh
University of Glasgow
University of Edinburgh
University of Edinburgh

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hibberd_2010_Neurology_out-patients_with_symptoms_unexplained_by_disease.pdf544.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.