|Appears in Collections:||School of Health Sciences Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||What influence does experience play in heel prick blood sampling?|
|Keywords:||Heel prick blood sampling|
|Publisher:||Elsevier Ltd / Neonatal Nurses Association|
|Citation:||Shepherd A, Glenesk A & Niven C (2006) What influence does experience play in heel prick blood sampling?, Journal of Neonatal Nursing, 12 (3), pp. 97-102.|
|Abstract:||The objective of this study was to investigate the role of ‘experience’ in performing the heel prick test. Babies (n ¼ 340) were randomly allocated to be tested with either the Tenderfoot or Genie Lancet heel prick device. Testing was conducted by nine midwives (n ¼ 4, experienced, more than 20 years qualified) who performed the heel prick procedure routinely and rotational midwives (n ¼ 5, less experienced, 4e8 years qualified) who only performed the heel prick procedure when working in the community. Test technique outcomes investigated included (1) cleaning of heel, (2) babies position, (3) feeding at test, (4) use of soothing words. Other test outcomes (1) quality of the blood sample, (2) number of heel pricks required to take sample, (3) blood flow, (4) presence of bruising (5) time taken to collect sample, (6) time squeezing the heel and (7) time baby cried were also studied. The experienced midwives were more likely to hold the baby during testing but less likely to clean the infants heel prior to the incision. The experienced midwives collected a better quality sample, in less time and required fewer heel pricks than the less experienced midwifery group.|
|Rights:||Published in the Journal of Neonatal Nursing by Elsevier Ltd / Neonatal Nurses Association. The Journal of Neonatal Nursing is available online at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13551841|
|Affiliation:||HS Research - Stirling|
University of Stirling
|shepherd - journal of neonatal nursing.pdf||150.94 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.