|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections|
|Title:||Minds, Things and Materiality|
|Citation:||Wheeler M (2010) Minds, Things and Materiality. In: Malafouris L, Renfrew C (ed.). The Cognitive Life of Things: Recasting the Boundaries of the Mind. McDonald Institute monographs, Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research Publications, pp. 29-37.|
|Publisher:||McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research Publications|
|Series/Report no.:||McDonald Institute monographs|
|Abstract:||First paragraph: In a rich and thought-provoking paper, Lambros Malafouris argues that taking material culture seriously means to be 'systematically concerned with figuring out the causal efficacy of materiality in the enactment and constitution of a cognitive system or operation' (Malafouris 2004, 55). As I understand this view, there are really two intertwined claims to be established. The first is that the things beyond the skin that make up material culture (in other words, the physical objects and artefacts in which cultural networks and systems of human social relations are realized) may be essential to the enactment of, and be partly constitutive of, certain cognitive systems or operations. The consequence of establishing this claim is supposed to be that we have a mandate to recast the boundaries of the mind so as to include, as proper parts of the mind, things located beyond the skin. Thus, in talking about the contribution of the world to cognition, Malafouris (2004, 58) concludes that 'what we have traditionally construed as an active or passive but always clearly separated external stimulus for setting a cognitive mechanism into motion, may be after all a continuous part of the machinery itself; at least ex hypothesi'. This is the position that, in philosophical circles, is known increasingly as the extended mind hypothesis (Clark & Chalmers 1998; Menary forthcoming). Henceforth I shall refer to this hypothesis as EM. A stock example will help bring the idea into view. Rumelhart et al. (1986) note that most of us solve difficult multiplication problems by using 'pen and paper' as an external resource. This environmental prop enables us to transform a difficult cognitive problem into a set of simpler ones, and to temporarily store the results of certain intermediate calculations. For the fan of EM, the distributed combination of this external resource and certain inner psychological processes constitutes a cognitive system in its own right.|
|Rights:||The publisher has granted permission for use of this work in this Repository. Published in The Cognitive Life of Things: Recasting the Boundaries of the Mind by McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research Publications: http://www.oxbowbooks.com/oxbow/cognitive-life-of-things.html|
|Type:||Part of book or chapter of book|
|wheeler_minds_things_materiality_final.pdf||135.84 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.