Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/11456
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEbert, Philip-
dc.contributor.authorShapiro, Stewart-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T16:57:37Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-20T16:57:37Z-
dc.date.issued2009-10-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/11456-
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses the neo-logicist approach to the foundations of mathematics by highlighting an issue that arises from looking at the Bad Company objection from an epistemological perspective. For the most part, our issue is independent of the details of any resolution of the Bad Company objection and, as we will show, it concerns other foundational approaches in the philosophy of mathematics. In the first two sections, we give a brief overview of the "Scottish" neo-logicist school, present a generic form of the Bad Company objection and introduce an epistemic issue connected to this general problem that will be the focus of the rest of the paper. In the third section, we present an alternative approach within philosophy of mathematics, a view that emerges from Hilbert's Grundlagen der Geometrie (1899, Leipzig: Teubner; Foundations of geometry (trans.: Townsend, E.). La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1959.). We will argue that Bad Company-style worries, and our concomitant epistemic issue, also affects this conception and other foundationalist approaches. In the following sections, we then offer various ways to address our epistemic concern, arguing, in the end, that none resolves the issue. The final section offers our own resolution which, however, runs against the foundationalist spirit of the Scottish neo-logicist program.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relationEbert P & Shapiro S (2009) The good, the bad and the ugly, Synthese, 170 (3), pp. 415-441.-
dc.rightsPublisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Synthese, October 2009, Volume 170, Issue 3, pp 415-441 by Springer. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com-
dc.subjectAbstraction principlesen_UK
dc.subjectNeo-Logicismen_UK
dc.subjectFregeen_UK
dc.subjectHilberten_UK
dc.subjectFoundationalismen_UK
dc.subjectImplicit definitionsen_UK
dc.subjectBasic knowledgeen_UK
dc.titleThe good, the bad and the uglyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9263-9-
dc.citation.jtitleSynthese-
dc.citation.issn0039-7857-
dc.citation.volume170-
dc.citation.issue3-
dc.citation.spage415-
dc.citation.epage441-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPost-print (author final draft post-refereeing)-
dc.author.emailp.a.ebert@stir.ac.uk-
dc.contributor.affiliationPhilosophy-
dc.contributor.affiliationOhio State University-
dc.identifier.isi000269536800006-
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.pdf84.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.