Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/11434
Appears in Collections: | History and Politics Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Accusations of Blasphemy in English Anti-Quaker Polemic, c.1660-1701 |
Author(s): | Manning, David |
Contact Email: | david.manning@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | blasphemy anti-Quaker polemic theology antitrinitarianism enthusiasm |
Issue Date: | 2009 |
Date Deposited: | 20-Mar-2013 |
Citation: | Manning D (2009) Accusations of Blasphemy in English Anti-Quaker Polemic, c.1660-1701. Quaker Studies, 14 (1), pp. 27-56. |
Abstract: | This paper investigates the conviction amongst zealous English Protestants, living between 1660 and 1701, that Quakerism constituted a form of blasphemy. Through an analysis of the accusation of blasphemy in anti-Quaker polemic it develops a cultural history of blasphemy as representation, illuminating a spiritual critique of Quakerism as enthusiastic antitrinitarianism and a sense of blasphemy commensurate with Thomistic theology. In so doing, this paper provides an insight into the contemporary theological anxiety that Quakerism was fundamentally wicked and anti-Christian. |
Rights: | Publisher allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Quaker Studies, 14.1, pp.27-56, 2009, by QRSA. |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Manning 'Anti-Quaker Polemic'.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 236.54 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.