Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/11298
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport eTheses |
Title: | Ambulance Service Treat and Refer Guidelines: A qualitative investigation into the use of Treat and Refer Guidelines by Ambulance Clinicians |
Author(s): | Colver, Keith A. |
Supervisor(s): | Niven, Catherine Abhyankar, Purva Dalgleish, Len |
Keywords: | ambulance community paramedic decision-making emergency care practitioner non-conveyance non-transport paramedic treat and refer |
Issue Date: | 26-Nov-2012 |
Publisher: | University of Stirling |
Abstract: | Background: Over the last decade there has been a steadily increasing demand for unscheduled healthcare services, including the ambulance services. To address this demand, various projects have been developed to reduce admissions to the emergency department. One of these was the introduction of Treat and Refer (T&R) guidelines, to allow ambulance clinicians to treat certain groups of patients in the community without the need to convey them to hospital. Aims: This study aims to explore the challenges and barriers faced by ambulance clinicians in the use of T&R guidelines, to inform the future development and governance of non-conveyance guidelines and interventions. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a group of 18 ambulance clinicians. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Setting: A national United Kingdom NHS ambulance service. Key results: There was a broad support for the concept and policy of T&R; however the participants had mixed views with respect to the actual practice of treating and referring patients. Participants acknowledged the potential benefits of T&R for patients and the health service, but identified several risks in using T & R in routine practice. Their perceptions of risk seemed to determine whether and how the guidelines were used. Challenges in the use of T&R included: lack of training and knowledge, fear of litigation, a lack of support from the management and difficulties in decision making. Conclusions: This study and the supporting literature do not support the use of T&R guidelines in their current format by traditionally trained ambulance clinicians. Ambulance clinicians have identified the need for further education and support. The conceptual support for T&R may provide a foundation to develop and improve the education and support for ambulance clinicians. This should be combined with implementation/review strategies, clinician-led decision support and management support which can provide the ambulance clinician with the skills and confidence to take responsibility for non-conveyance. |
Type: | Thesis or Dissertation |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/11298 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Keith Colver_Treat and Refer_ MPhil Thesis_FINAL.pdf | 1.51 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.