Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/11292
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: "We're not short of people telling us what the problems are. We're short of people telling us what to do": An appraisal of public policy and mental health
Authors: Petticrew, Mark
Platt, Stephen
McCollam, Allyson
Wilson, Sarah
Thomas, Sian
Contact Email: sarah.wilson@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: mental health, well being, policy
Issue Date: Sep-2008
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd
Citation: Petticrew M, Platt S, McCollam A, Wilson S & Thomas S (2008) "We're not short of people telling us what the problems are. We're short of people telling us what to do": An appraisal of public policy and mental health, BMC Public Health, 8 (314).
Abstract: Background: There is sustained interest in public health circles in assessing the effects of policies on health and health inequalities. We report on the theory, methods and findings of a project which involved an appraisal of current Scottish policy with respect to its potential impacts on mental health and wellbeing. Methods: We developed a method of assessing the degree of alignment between Government policies and the 'evidence base', involving: reviewing theoretical frameworks; analysis of policy documents, and nineteen in-depth interviews with policymakers which explored influences on, and barriers to cross-cutting policymaking and the use of research evidence in decisionmaking. Results: Most policy documents did not refer to mental health; however most referred indirectly to the determinants of mental health and well-being. Unsurprisingly research evidence was rarely cited; this was more common in health policy documents. The interviews highlighted the barriers to intersectoral policy making, and pointed to the relative value of qualitative and quantitative research, as well as to the imbalance of evidence between "what is known" and "what is to be done". Conclusion: Healthy public policy depends on effective intersectoral working between government departments, along with better use of research evidence to identify policy impacts. This study identified barriers to both these. We also demonstrated an approach to rapidly appraising the mental health effects of mainly non-health sector policies, drawing on theoretical understandings of mental health and its determinants, research evidence and policy documents. In the case of the social determinants of health, we conclude that an evidence-based approach to policymaking and to policy appraisal requires drawing strongly upon existing theoretical frameworks, as well as upon research evidence, but that there are significant practical barriers and disincentives.
Type: Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/11292
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-314
Rights: © 2008 Petticrew et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Affiliation: MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit
University of Edinburgh
Scottish Development Centre for Mental Health
Applied Social Science
University of Glasgow

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wilson article_BMCPH_2008.pdf244.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.