Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/10984
Appears in Collections: | Accounting and Finance Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | International lease-accounting reform and economic consequences: The views of U.K. users and preparers |
Author(s): | Beattie, Vivien Goodacre, Alan Smith, Sarah Jane |
Contact Email: | alan.goodacre@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | Lease accounting Off-balance-sheet finance Survey Economic consequences Lobbying |
Issue Date: | 2006 |
Date Deposited: | 11-Feb-2013 |
Citation: | Beattie V, Goodacre A & Smith SJ (2006) International lease-accounting reform and economic consequences: The views of U.K. users and preparers. International Journal of Accounting, 41 (1), pp. 75-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2005.12.003 |
Abstract: | In response to perceived difficulties with extant lease-accounting standards in operation worldwide, the G4+1 issued a discussion paper which proposes that all leases should be recognized on the balance sheet. Leasing is now on the active agenda of the IASB. A major difficulty faced by standard setters lies in overcoming the preparer/user lobbying imbalance and obtaining ex ante evidence on the likely impact of regulatory reform. This paper contributes to the ongoing international debate by conducting a questionnaire survey of UK users and preparers to assess their views on proposals for lease-accounting reform and on the potential economic consequences of their adoption. The results, based on 132 responses, indicate that both groups accept that there are deficiencies in the current rules, but they do not agree on the way forward and believe that the proposals would lead to significant economic consequences for key parties. The impact on respondents’ views of familiarity with the proposals, level of lease usage, and company size, is also examined. |
DOI Link: | 10.1016/j.intacc.2005.12.003 |
Rights: | Published in The International Journal of Accounting by Elsevier; Elsevier believes that individual authors should be able to distribute their accepted author manuscripts for their personal voluntary needs and interests, e.g. posting to their websites or their institution’s repository, e-mailing to colleagues. The Elsevier Policy is as follows: Authors retain the right to use the accepted author manuscript for personal use, internal institutional use and for permitted scholarly posting provided that these are not for purposes of commercial use or systematic distribution. An "accepted author manuscript" is the author’s version of the manuscript of an article that has been accepted for publication and which may include any author-incorporated changes suggested through the processes of submission processing, peer review, and editor-author communications. |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
IJA lease accg reform final version pre pub 0905.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 623.29 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.