Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/10467
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: How people present symptoms to health services: a theory-based content analysis
Authors: Farquharson, Barbara
Johnston, Marie
Bugge, Carol
Contact Email: barbara.farquharson1@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: consultation
symptoms
telephone triage
Issue Date: Apr-2011
Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioners
Citation: Farquharson B, Johnston M & Bugge C (2011) How people present symptoms to health services: a theory-based content analysis, British Journal of General Practice, 61 (585), pp. 267-273.
Abstract: Background: How people present symptoms to health services may influence the care they subsequently receive. Leventhal's Commonsense Model of Self-Regulation (CS-SRM) posits that individuals develop cognitive illness representations elaborated around five main components (identity, timeline, cause, consequences, and cure/control), coherence, and emotional representations. Aim: To examine whether initial presentations to health services consist of the components of illness representation proposed by the CS-SRM. Design and setting: A CS-SRM-based content analysis of calls to the Scottish national telephone advice service, NHS 24. Method: A random sample of callers to NHS 24 was identified. A quota sample of 60 consented to participate. Their consultations were transcribed verbatim. Responses to an initial open question regarding the reason for calling were identified and divided into 'meaning units'. A coding schedule was developed using Leventhal's definitions of illness representations. Meaning units were coded independently by two researchers. Results: Fifty-nine eligible initial presentations contained between 1 and 13 coding units, (mean = 4). A total of 230 coding units were available for coding. Overall, 202 (88%) coding units were coded to at least one component of illness representation. All 59 (100%) participants made reference to identity, 26 (44%) to timeline, nine (15%) to cause, eight (14%) to consequences, 22 (37%) to cure/control, and 11 (19%) to the degree of coherence. Emotional representations were identified in six (10%) participants' presentations. Conclusion: Leventhal's CS-SRM accounts for a large proportion of initial presentations to health services. Most people offer identity plus at least one additional component of illness representation. It may be necessary for clinicians to prompt remaining components to obtain a comprehensive understanding of patients' representations of illness.
Type: Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/10467
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X567090
Rights: Publisher allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published by the Royal College of General Practitioners.
Affiliation: NMAHP Research
University of Aberdeen
HS Research - Stirling

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FarquharsonEtal_BJGP_2010.pdf145.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.